Re: RPM %changelog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 16:12 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:39:19PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> > Hmmm. I think I don't consider it duplicated information. A commit
>> > messages in the VCS afaics is something that is written for other
>> > developers that want to understand/track changes (now or in the future).
>>
>> This was my first thought too -- but then, there's also dist-git, which
>> may be what this refers to.
>
> It is, but the distinction still holds. The intended readers of the
> dist-git commit messages are the distribution packagers: the package
> 'developers'. The intended readers of the RPM changelogs are the RPM
> consumers, i.e. users (albeit users with the moderate level of savvy
> necessary to read RPM changelogs).

Neither are really satisfactory for a number of reasons.

>>  I wouldn't be completely opposed to phasing
>> out in-package changelogs in favor of some tool which presents that to
>> users in a nice way. (dnf plugin!)
>
> Please, no, don't do that. RPM is a standard, the changelog is part of
> that. It would be pretty crappy to just declare we're going to stop
> using RPM changelogs and bake some random new idea into our distro's
> packaging tools instead.

I agree with Adam here.

josh
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux