Re: RPM %changelog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 25/10/16 14:56, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:00:21PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Please, no, don't do that. RPM is a standard, the changelog is part of
that. It would be pretty crappy to just declare we're going to stop
using RPM changelogs and bake some random new idea into our distro's
packaging tools instead.
I agree with Adam here.

So do I

Well, except -- it doesn't come for free. I was just talking to David
Shea about something different and he mentioned that changelogs
comprise about 40% of RPM metadata, both on disk and in-memory for
every transaction.

Which raises another issue: How long history should be kept in the spec file? Can't we have some policy stating that we can purge entries older then X years, and tooling support for that? Trusting whatever VCS we have for the longer history?

--alec
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux