Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> Nevertheless, at the link that I posted before, you can see for yourself
> the exact use case, so that should make things clear enough. Contradictory
> or not (as I said maybe the original descriptions possibly need to be
> rephrased), arguing about that does not really contribute anything to the
> discussion.

Pointing out the contradiction contributes to the discussion that it points 
out that the claimed guarantees that you will not end up with the old 
Pythons without installing them explicitly are blatantly false if there will 
be exceptions to the "no dependencies on those packages" rule.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux