On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:05:34PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:33:30PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote: > > > > > > I found this article stating some alarming claims about systemd > > > security, are this claims true? > > > > > > > First of all, do not hijack threads. If you want to start something new, > > start it, and do not reply to unrelated thread. > > I'm not hijacking any thread, I STARTED this thread (BTW, just searched for emails > with the "Systemd Security" subject in this mailing list and didn't find any > immediate matches) because i have an honest concern for Systemd Security and > general functionality. > > Couldn't you just post this link instead of mistakenly ranting about imaginary thread > hijacking? Your email header contained: In-Reply-To: <CA+Sa5Fpf5zLb1vYYaauRgRMS19pO1S4PT6oF+XEu53eWw_q6qw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <20161005230810.D6E91608780A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1886682.CMX2iRJoBU@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1475767811.24685.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+Sa5Fpf5zLb1vYYaauRgRMS19pO1S4PT6oF+XEu53eWw_q6qw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Which clearly places it as a reply in thread about Fedora 25 compose status. QED -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx one blends softly casual into the other. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
