Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
From: Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:29:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <20161005181912.GD30028@mattdm.org>
References: <20161005181912.GD30028@mattdm.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0

On 10/05/2016 01:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:

In any case, what do you all think?


What happened to the Nice-To-Have (NTH) tag?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
  - From: Tim Flink
- Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

References:
- PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
  - From: Matthew Miller

Prev by Date: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
Next by Date: Fedora Rawhide-20161005.n.0 compose check report
Previous by thread: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux