Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > >  This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing bugs :-(
> > >  We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their
> > >  bug reports are going to be ignored until Fedora EOL procedure closes
> > >  them :-(
> > 
> > One lesson I have learnt in Fedora, is that filing bugs reports against
> > packages owned by certain people equals to sending bugs to /dev/null.
> > 
> > IMHO, Fedora should consider to take disciplinary measures against these
> > people.
> 
> And get less packagers?
> 
> It would be useful if package co-owners would automatically get added to
> the bugzilla bug, instead of only the package owner. Most packages don't
> have dedicated aliases for that.

Everyone having `watchbugzilla` on a package is automatically cc'ed to the bug
reports.
In the early days of pkgdb2, I had it be: everyone with `watchbugzilla` or
`commit` but I was asked to remove that last condition [1].

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ticket/10


Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux