On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: >> On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> > >> > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build >> > tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves >> > now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as soon as any one fails), but >> > a failure of any of them will still constitute a failure of the overall >> > task. >> >> Well that's how I read it at first as well, but if you read on it talks >> about how to deal with subsequent builds seeing different libraries if >> some builds had failed, which implies the task wouldn't be failed and >> the builds had worked would be published. >> >> So currently I think we can only say it's somewhat unclear what the plan >> is... > > It talks about that as a *justification* for not doing it: > > "The issue with not failing all builds when a single arch fails is how > we deal with any builds that are dependent on that package?" > > i.e. it's saying the reason they chose *not* to allow builds to succeed > with some arches failing is because of the problem of dependent > packages then being out of sync across arches. That's already the situation now, anyway. And we're not unique in this. Debian does things similarly with their autobuilder/buildd system. If anything we probably just need some way to track on a per arch level to warn when it happens so that the right people can deal with the situation. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
