Re: Redefinition of the primary and secondary architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 15:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> 
> I think the solid way to address this is to make each architecture
> independent and don't stop the build for any arch if any other arch
> fails. The total failure state can be figured out once all the arches
> have completed and based on criteria on which ones are considered
> fatal or not, it would make a judgement. This is how it is done in
> Youri for Mageia. When we submit packages to build, all architectures
> build. However, only a failure in i586 and x86_64 triggers the failed
> state. Builds in armv5tl and armv7hl do not.

The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build
tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves
now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as soon as any one fails), but
a failure of any of them will still constitute a failure of the overall
task.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux