On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 21:02 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 04/08/16 20:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > The page says that Koji will be modified to run all the per-arch build > > tasks to completion even if one fails (as opposed to how it behaves > > now, cancelling all the other arch tasks as soon as any one fails), but > > a failure of any of them will still constitute a failure of the overall > > task. > > Well that's how I read it at first as well, but if you read on it talks > about how to deal with subsequent builds seeing different libraries if > some builds had failed, which implies the task wouldn't be failed and > the builds had worked would be published. > > So currently I think we can only say it's somewhat unclear what the plan > is... It talks about that as a *justification* for not doing it: "The issue with not failing all builds when a single arch fails is how we deal with any builds that are dependent on that package?" i.e. it's saying the reason they chose *not* to allow builds to succeed with some arches failing is because of the problem of dependent packages then being out of sync across arches. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
