> > Where's the ignored epoch?
>
> The user use (want/need) glibc-gconvdata-1:
No, he doesn't. I was at his side when the problem happened.
> > > I don't know (or care) if this is good or bad. But %{epoch} (as I
> > > understand it) is not a version.
> >
> > What are you talking about?
>
> "glibc-gconvdata-1: > glibc-gconvdata-0:" is false.
No, it isn't.
> glibc-gconvdata-1: != glibc-gconvdata-0: is true. They are two different
> packages. Smart replace an apple by an orange.
That's excelent, since the user asked for the orange.
--
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net
