Le mercredi 19 janvier 2005 à 14:19 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer a écrit :
> > > > It is Interesting. But sometimes it ignore %{epoch} (for good or bad
> > >
> > > I'm unaware about such problems. Please, let me know if you find any
> > > cases I might study.
> >
> > README :
> > http://linux-br.conectiva.com.br/~niemeyer/smart/doc/README.html#case-1-
> > apt
>
> Can you please be a little bit more verbose? Smart is not ignoring
> the epoch anywhere there.
http://linux-br.conectiva.com.br/~niemeyer/smart/doc/README.html#case-1-apt
Version 2.3.3 is needed, but *1*:2.3.2-586_1cl is to be
installed. This message is mostly correct. The only problem is,
"*1*:2.3.2-586_1cl" is already installed:
Version 2.3.3 means *0*:2.3.3.
[root@damien:/root] smart install xscreensaver
Updating cache... ######################################## [100%]
Computing transaction...
Downgrading packages (1): <==
glibc-gconvdata-0:2.3.3-69473cl.i386 <== replace *1*:2.3.2
I don't know (or care) if this is good or bad. But %{epoch} (as I
understand it) is not a version.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
