On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:25:13AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Yes, is the direction I'm thinking. The Layered Image Build Service we > > have for Docker can automatically rebuild when there are updates to > > component RPMs, and it'd be nice if we could channel Flatpak through > > that. Flatpak does have a little bit of awkwardness, though, since it > > needs to understand nonstandard paths and locations, so it'd probably > > involve rebuilding the RPMs, or at least some kind of crazy rearranging > > of binaries. > Is this what relocatable packages are supposed to solve? > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-reloc.html Yeah, that might be one way. Not very many packages are made so that works, though. Maybe we could put more effort into it. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
