On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:09:19PM +0100, Howard Chu wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I am very much in favor of systemd enforcing that the session actually > > ends when I log out, so that I don't accidentally leave processes > > running. Leaking session processes have been a perennial problem that > > we have been battling forever (gconf, ibus, pulseaudio, the list goes > > on...). And they are causing actual problems, from preventing re-login > > to subtly breaking the next session to slowing down shutdown. > > So far you have only identified problems associated with GUI sessions. I > still see no justification for terminating *all* user processes when it's > clear there's only a problem with one very specific class of processes, all > being launched in a very specific context. Yeah, to me it sounds like these problematic processes should say "kill me when the session ends", rather than others having to opt-out. If the processes are killed by default, won't other applications start to rely on it and users who change the default will have more and more applications running after logout? -- Miroslav Lichvar -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
