Re: Policy change on emulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2016 02:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-05-05 10:59, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> I would think that it requiring S3TC would be more of a blocker.  But
>> then again, maybe it's possible for someone to cook up their own game
>> content that doesn't use compressed textures, but I don't see that as
>> being particularly useful.
> 
> Is S2TC a (legally and performance-wise) viable alternative for Fedora?
> 
> https://github.com/divVerent/s2tc

I see no legal reason that Fedora could not include that S2TC
implementation. Can't speak to the performance viability of it.

~tom

==
Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux