Re: Policy change on emulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2016 04:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free
> assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for
> other than the assests from a proprietary game?

The assets should not be a problem unless they're tied directly into
openmw as a runtime dependency (see Stephen's earlier example of the
PlayStation emulators that require a firmware blob).

> There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some
> platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might
> attract a lawsuit if someone did.

This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understand that
situation before giving openmw the all-clear.

~tom

==
Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux