Re: Policy change on emulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2016 08:07 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some
>>> platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might
>>> attract a lawsuit if someone did.
>>
>> This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understand that
>> situation before giving openmw the all-clear.
> 
> Unless you are curious, there is no need to look at it now. The FAQ
> entry covering the issue (https://openmw.org/faq/#bethesda_legal) has a
> link to a wiki page with their back and forth with Bethsheda which
> should let you make a decision, if the people who have packaged it in
> rpmfusion wish to try to get it into Fedora proper.

That's a very strange situation, but I don't think it would affect
inclusion of openmw in Fedora.

~tom

==
Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux