On 6 May 2016 17:24, "Jerry James" <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These
> are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing
> GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607: gap-pkg-scscp
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332764: gap-pkg-factint
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333204: gap-pkg-utils
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333235: gap-pkg-crisp
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333916: gap-pkg-polenta
>
I'd be happy to go through these for you Jerry.
In return could you please take a gander at the letsencrypt->certbot re-review I submitted today.
Upstream plans their public rename towards the end of the week so it'd be good to have our rename in the testing repos by then.
Cheers
James
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
