On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 05:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, ... > What are the additional dependencies compared to Udisks2? None AFAIK: storaged itself should not pull anything else than udisks2 in the current Rawhide. > Would gnome-disk-utility, gvfs, etc. work as well as they used to without > regressions when dropping in storaged, either on a running system, or when > compiling against it? Yes, such is the plan. > Will bug fixes and enhancements to the common part between storaged and > udisks2 be backported to udisks2? I assume this is a question for the udisks2 developers. > I'm fairly certain we don't want iSCSI binaries in the Workstation > installation (we've been trying to get rid of the ones that Anaconda brings > in already). > > I also don't see why ZRam is something 1) you'd want to have to configure, > 2) that has its place in a storage API. It's been put to the API because Blivet would like to use it from storaged eventually. However you're right: this is something that the user may not want to install and therefore the storaged-zram is a separate package. Same as LSM, LVM2, iSCSI, bcache and BTRFS plugins. Of course the plugins have their own additional dependencies. Regards, -- Tomáš Smetana Platform Engineering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
