Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
<snip>
> > 2) that has its place in a storage API.
> Why is an API providing some additional functionality you are not going
> to use in your specific usecase a problem ?
> 
> I'm sure glibc and kernel provide many API calls not directly used by
> the default apps on the workstation and we are still using them...

If I ever saw an example of logical fallacy, that is one.

Why do I care? Because if I didn't whine on this very list some time ago,
storaged wouldn't be API-compatible with udisks2, and I have to wonder about
the architecture of something we would have to support when it makes
decisions like supporting features for which you don't have a clear use-case.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux