----- Original Message ----- > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 05:09:00 -0400 (EDT) > Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hey, > ... > > What are the additional dependencies compared to Udisks2? > > None AFAIK: storaged itself should not pull anything else than udisks2 in > the current Rawhide. > > > Would gnome-disk-utility, gvfs, etc. work as well as they used to without > > regressions when dropping in storaged, either on a running system, or when > > compiling against it? > > Yes, such is the plan. > > > Will bug fixes and enhancements to the common part between storaged and > > udisks2 be backported to udisks2? > > I assume this is a question for the udisks2 developers. It's not. I don't think that Workstation wants to stray from upstream GNOME, which uses udisks2, so providing maintenance would be useful. > > I'm fairly certain we don't want iSCSI binaries in the Workstation > > installation (we've been trying to get rid of the ones that Anaconda brings > > in already). > > > > I also don't see why ZRam is something 1) you'd want to have to configure, > > 2) that has its place in a storage API. > > It's been put to the API because Blivet would like to use it from storaged > eventually. Still, I don't understand the use-case for such an interface. > However you're right: this is something that the user may not > want > to install and therefore the storaged-zram is a separate package. Same as > LSM, LVM2, iSCSI, bcache and BTRFS plugins. Of course the plugins have their > own additional dependencies. Would that mean that we don't need to ship with the iscsi initiator in Workstation because there would be no direct or indirect dependencies in Anaconda, for example? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
