>>>>> "FAL" == Fabio Alessandro Locati <fabiolocati@xxxxxxxxx> writes: FAL> If a person is not able to make a click in 7 days (maybe vacation FAL> periods could be excluded from the count), why should he be able to FAL> do so in the following 21 days? I think that a better question is: If a maintainer is not able to deal with such things in a reasonable time, why are they the only maintainer listed for a package? We used to have a vacation page, but that's kind of weird privacy page. I always try to let people I trust know when I'm going to be away. Certainly if you are going to be away so long that you can't address a comaintainership request in a reasonable time then that's exactly the situation where you need comaintainers. We really need to not be in the situation where a package has only one maintainer. And we really need to make sure that everyone knows that provenpackagers are going to be touching your packages and people are going to try and get involved. They just are. If you can't handle that (and maybe having to do an occasional merge or revert) then you'd better have something at the top of your spec explaining the situation. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
