This jumped out at me as particularly worrisome: On 19 February 2016 at 19:15, Fabio Alessandro Locati <fabiolocati@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If Christopher will not respond, I can take care of: [snip] > Also I can help with the i3 packages as I volounteered few weeks ago and > have been shot down by Christopher becase "no more help is needed". > My personal opinion is that (with a few possible exceptions, perhaps critical path, or a subset of that), co-maintainership requests shouldn't ever be turned down. That's really not in the spirit of Fedora. Which makes me wonder why, for most packages, we even need approval from the point of contact when requesting commit access on packages. Perhaps we need to have a clear policy on this? Cheers, Jonathan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
