Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> My personal opinion is that (with a few possible exceptions, perhaps
> critical path, or a subset of that), co-maintainership requests
> shouldn't ever be turned down. That's really not in the spirit of
> Fedora. Which makes me wonder why, for most packages, we even need
> approval from the point of contact when requesting commit access on
> packages.
Huh? This just doesn't make sense. Either we have ACLs or we don't. If you
are going to just blanket-allow ACL requests, then why not just drop the
whole ACL scheme entirely (i.e., s/provenpackager/packager/ as in the good
old cvsextras days)?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
