Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 00:00 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to > > > yum? > > > > > > ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not > > > production > > > ready AND REMOVE THE DEPRECATED WARNINGS for "package-cleanup" > > > and > > > "yum-deprecated" until DNF is useable and provides the same > > > capabilities > > > as yum/yum-utils > > > > > And please don't forget that the autoremove command is unusable at > > least since somewhere between Fedora 23 beta and final. That's > > absolutely unacceptable! > > > > So please fix your shit or remove the parts you can't fix! And > > until > > then de-deprecate yum until dnf is feature-complete, in a usable > > stage > > and you can guarantee dnf will stay in that stage for a long time. > > I would like to point out that this way of communicating is not > welcome on this > list. If you have something to say, please say it but be respectful > in your tone > and wording with everyone and everyone's work. We are all on the same > boat and > shooting each other on the legs isn't going to help. > You may want to refresh your memory on our code of conduct: > https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct > I apologize for that mail and I'll try to say it more respectful this time: The first time i noticed the autoerase feature of dnf seems to be broken was somewhere between Fedora 23 beta and final. But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015 [1], which is IMHO unacceptable since a default package manager and all of its features have to work absolutely reliable. And in my case autoerase want's to remove half of my GNOME desktop which seems to be reliable a very bad joke. But IMHO this reliability seems to be not the case ATM so I'd prefer to rollback the switch from yum to dnf at least until the broken features are fixed and dnf works absolutely reliable (again). And the next time it would be nice if switching the package manager would only affect fresh installations. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190141 -- Regards, Heiko Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
