Re: dnf still is unuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 18.01.2016 um 00:48 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...snip...

"dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work

Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions installed at a time it makes more sense
for it to be a install than an upgrade (which would imply that the old
version would be removed).

why?

because you don't type "dnf install kernel" instead "dnf upgrade" and "kernel-headers" *is never installed* in multiple versions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271676

This seems like a matter of taste. If you want to keep yearly logs,
set your logrotate that way.

AFAIR the config files are not config noreplace"

The spec seems to have:
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{name}

well, give it a try, but for many years you had yum-logs for the complete year rotated once on the begin of a new year - package updates are not that often and don#t flood logs like some systemd things

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux