Re: dnf still is unuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:01:13 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...snip...
 
> "dnf update *.rpm" is the way which has to work

Why? It works fine as a install. It's installing a new kernel, since
kernels can have many versions installed at a time it makes more sense
for it to be a install than an upgrade (which would imply that the old
version would be removed). 

> 
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c14
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271676  
> >
> > This seems like a matter of taste. If you want to keep yearly logs,
> > set your logrotate that way.  
> 
> AFAIR the config files are not config noreplace"

The spec seems to have:
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{name}

kevin

Attachment: pgpPFobd2sl_u.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux