Re: dnf still is unuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:27:02 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> for localupdate i switched back to yum-deprecated long ago, but for 
> ordinary kernel updates pretend unsolved deps is simply unacceptable
> 
> *no* i am not the only one - see karma comments for 4.3.3-300.fc23

But your comment doesn't explain what you are even doing. 
What was the command and all output? 

For localling installing new kernel versions, I use 'dnf install' and
it works just fine here. 

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888#c14
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271676

This seems like a matter of taste. If you want to keep yearly logs, set
your logrotate that way. 

> may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum?

You can suggest it, but it's not going to happen, so I'd advise
relaxing some and working with dnf developers. 

I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct 
( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
respectful in bugs and here. We are all trying to improve things, lets
work together. 

kevin

Attachment: pgp44G2DCmJc4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux