Re: dnf still is unuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 18.01.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Am 17.01.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:

I'd encourage you to re-read our code of conduct
( https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct ) and try and be more
respectful in bugs and here. We are all trying to improve things, lets
work together


in case of such obvious bugs this *is* resepectful


No, it is not. Your tone and method of communication is highly
antagonistic in nature on both mailing lists and in bugs you've filed
in the Red Hat Bugzilla, and it's very hard to be willing to even
consider issues you experience when you continue to maintain such a
tone while trying to seek assistance or trying to get something fixed.

and replace a perfect working package manager is respectful to users?

Fedora is a large community and all of us love using and developing
the distribution. Passions may get a bit hot, but we should always be
respectful and constructive. We also don't live in isolation, and work
with other communities to develop excellent solutions that everyone
can use, including the many projects and products that are downstream
from Fedora.

dnf is far away from "excellent solutions"

just the fact that there are no useful outputs about the nature of a (mostly pretended) dependency problem disqualifies it while "yum-deprecated" shows you even soname-conflicts in a clear way

the case where i had enough again and wrote the mail above was a "dnf -v upgrade" with no useful output and "yum-deprecated upgrade" just worked fine as all the years ago - so *there is no* dependency problem

And if you really want something fixed that badly, talk to the DNF
development team about contributing to fix particular issues, or even
work with them one-on-one to help them fix it properly. Suggesting to
throw out DNF and re-instate Yum is not helpful and makes it really
easy to ignore you.

it would be enough to *remove* all that deprecation warnings for "yum-deprecated" and "package-cleanup" so that i could set an alias back to yum-deprecated

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux