On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:55:54AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > But it seems to be broken since Feb 2015, which is IMHO unacceptable > since a default package manager and all of its features have to work > absolutely reliable. When was the last time you saw a program bigger then /bin/true that was "absolutely reliable"? Your implicit premise that yum was bug free is completely bogus, just look for yum bugs in bugzilla [1]. It seems that with dnf we are currently in the phase of fine-tuning user interaction. The resolver works nicely, there is a growing system of plugins based on a stable API, the codebase was ported to the current version of python, speed is decent most of the time... There *are* things to fix, but calling for the return of yum is a complete waste of the time of everbody on this list. Zbyszek [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?classification=Fedora&component=yum&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
