Am 16.01.2016 um 19:43 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:kevin@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: The benchmark if it's legal to include something in Fedora is what Fedora Legal says. I basically would agree with everything you stated, except I would change the sentence to read: "The benchmark if it's permissible..." Fedora has it's own rules, but when you use the term "legal" the connotation is that the other distributions which are distributing ZFS are breaking the law
nonsenseif it comes to law topics in many cases 5 lawyers are coming up with 6 opinions and every decision made has *nothing* to do with any other party
Fedora cannot make that determination
it don't make it for others it just makes it for Fedoraif Redhat legal says "no" to be on the safe side that has *nothing* to do with any otehr distribution
blanket statements like that lead to FUD and misquotes. If Fedora chooses not to distribute ZFS for any reason, that is perfectly fine - however, the fact that we choose not to do so doesn't make it illegal
see above and now please *stop* this topic ZFS and external kmods don't make it to Fedora suck it!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
