Am 18.12.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Neil Horman:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:18:10PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:What I hear you saying is that on a system that has nothing better to do, the primary monitoring process wakes up periodically to check on various system aspects (cron jobs, journal rotates, etc). That sounds like working as designed to me, not a reason to throw the proverbial baby out with the bath water. That seems like a reason to do some tuning.it is wasting ressources in a container running only one process - period - what is there to discuss - in any serious setup there shou,ld be nothing installed which is not *really* neededYou're making two assumptions here: 1) That there is only one process 2) That systemd (or a component thereof) isn't needed While you're use case is certainly valid, it isn't the only use case by a long shot. And if the goal for your use case is to minimize the footprint of a container, you can already do that (as I've pointed out previously)
i don't make *any* assumptionssince kernel-core pull systemd anyways there is not much for discussion, by default systemd is there - so everybody is happy
the only difference is *where you know* you don't need it you are *able* to remove it
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
