Am 08.12.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Petr Spacek:
On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:Hi,Start moving away from split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home network then? Making the forward zone for home.kraxel.org public would at least work, although I fail to see the point in having public dns records for private networks. Registering the reverse zone is never ever going to work though ...For the record, this is an invalid example. Special-use domain names are listed in IANA registry http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml
what is there invalid? * rhsoft.net is my public zone * rhsoft.net is also my internal DNS zone * there is no point calling my smart-tv "tv.example.com" instead "tv.rhsoft.net" * there is also no point to add a 192.168.x.x record in public DNS * there is also no point calling my devices something.test * .local shouldn't be used (look in the samba list-archives)not that i am affected by any network changes Fedora decides since my local DNS server will always be a full featured BIND forwarding any non-lan zones over VPN to the comapany nameservers where i also control the internal and external DNS views, but there are *millions* of valid use-cases for split-DNS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
