Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
>> Start moving away from
>> split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
> 
> Seriously?  How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home
> network then?  Making the forward zone for home.kraxel.org public would
> at least work, although I fail to see the point in having public dns
> records for private networks.  Registering the reverse zone is never
> ever going to work though ...

For the record, this is an invalid example.

Special-use domain names are listed in IANA registry
http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml

It is not a problem to hard-code special-handling for domain names like
10.in-addr.arpa. so validation is not required for them, and that all queries
are always forwarded to local DNS servers.

Guys around dnssec-trigger actually done that in previous versions. Have you
tried it?

-- 
Petr Spacek  @  Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux