On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 20:52:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > That doesn't really add up. > > > > What doesn't add up? > > We were talking about a yum update that had been sitting around for > four months, with +10 karma. That may be the subject, but the messages have referred to many other updates where the maintainer could push manually. So, there have been comments on some general problems. > Your theory about why this kind of thing > happens doesn't match the facts of that situation: the update submitter > actually had to take specific action to make it so the update wouldn't > get pushed. How do you know? There have been Yum updates with autokarma of 15, afaik. And then 10 would not be enough. > If they were just 'fire'n'forget', the update would already > have gone stable weeks ago. You cannot tell. Updates with 0 karma could have been entered with a threshold of 3 and would never go stable due to lack of karma. I've entered updates with a threshold of 1 in fire'n'forget style and neither the bug reporter(s) or any testers have voted. What a surprise! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
