Adam Williamson wrote: > I've never understood why the idea of a 'last push of security fixes' > for an EOL release makes any sense. It's *EOL*. It doesn't matter if > there's a last-day push or not: everyone should stop using it the next > day, end of story. That's what EOL means. Realistically, some people will still be running EOL releases for months if not years. They should not, but they do. Getting at least the last pending security updates out before turning the pipes off for good should be a priority. It means they'd at least not be affected by those security issues, only by the later ones. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx