On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 03:29 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I've never understood why the idea of a 'last push of security fixes' > > for an EOL release makes any sense. It's *EOL*. It doesn't matter if > > there's a last-day push or not: everyone should stop using it the next > > day, end of story. That's what EOL means. > > Realistically, some people will still be running EOL releases for months if > not years. They should not, but they do. Getting at least the last pending > security updates out before turning the pipes off for good should be a > priority. It means they'd at least not be affected by those security issues, > only by the later ones. The problem is not specific to EOL releases. Security updates for other dist releases are affected in the same way. ;-) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
