On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 02:07 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 16:02:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 19:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 15:50:10 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > > > but what is the reason for maintainers building updates without the > > > > intention to push them? > > > > > > There are maintainers, who dislike a lot of things related to the release > > > processes. They consider bodhi a pain to use. They would prefer doing > > > things differently, with less work, and more like fire'n'forget as how > > > they do it within Rawhide. > > > > That doesn't really add up. > > What doesn't add up? We were talking about a yum update that had been sitting around for four months, with +10 karma. Your theory about why this kind of thing happens doesn't match the facts of that situation: the update submitter actually had to take specific action to make it so the update wouldn't get pushed. If they were just 'fire'n'forget', the update would already have gone stable weeks ago. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
