Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:50:16 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:

> >> Personally I find "install"/"update" naming more readable than "-Uvh"/"-Fvh".
> >
> > Note that -U and -F aren't meant to be readable. They're shorthand for
> > "--upgrade" and for "--freshen" respectively
> 
> but it's unexpected behavior that -U *installs* packages instead only 
> _U_pgrade installed ones while nobody ever searchs for "freshen"

If an _upgrade_ introduces new sub-packages or new dependencies, you
need a method that can install those new packages *and* update older
installed ones at the same time. Running "rpm -U *.rpm" is like asking
RPM to "upgrade the installation to the packages specified by *.rpm",
which may involve replacing older installed ones as well as adding new
packages to the installation.

To squeeze a similar feature into "dnf install *.rpm" would be odd as
long as "dnf update …" still accepts local package files, too.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux