Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 07.11.2015 um 15:41 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:20:03 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Error: nothing provides rpm-libs(x86-64) = 4.13.0-0.rc1.5.fc23 needed

0.rc1.5.fc23 ???
*sigh*  My motivation to do package reviews is hurt a lot by bad examples
like that. It's as if some people put a lot of effort into trying to ignore
the packaging guidelines:

   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages

  => 0.5.fc1.fc23  is what it's supposed to be

Why apply the pre-release versioning scheme, if another scheme works, too?
This time even in the RPM package itself. Explain that to new packagers!
All you can do is tell them that there are packaging guidelines and
pitfalls, and that some people hate the guidelines.

Fedora 23 was *released* with rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.3.fc23.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.onet.pl/pub/mirrors/fedora/linux/releases/23/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/r/rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.3.fc23.x86_64.rpm


your complaints have *nothing* to do with teh fact that DNF is constantly unable to deal with local packages, not only that ones, most of the time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux