On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:52:01 -0400 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > At some point, it might be worth doing cost/benefit analysis on > continuing down our existing mirroring strategy and designing for the > limits of that vs. the application of some sponsor funds towards the > use of more standard CDN service and methodology. Yeah. We looked at one of the existing CDNs a while back, but the way it was setup was not very friendly to the sort of content we have. They were more expecting slowly changing static content, where we have lots of changes all the time. Things may have changed or other vendors might be different. In any case even if we had a CDN we controlled, it wouldn't change the fact that if you download repodata one day it may not be good the next. We could fix that I suppose by simply only pushing updates once a week or something, but I bet people wouldn't like that "solution". ;) kevin
Attachment:
pgpDSBrVDl17n.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
