On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 31 July 2015 at 17:27, Radek Holy <rholy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> One can say that the mirrors should keep the older versions > > I would completely agree. As we can't rely that packages referenced in > metadata just one day old still being on the mirrors means that > PackageKit has to download hundreds of megabytes month more than it > has to. > > Richard. In the RHEL world, EPEL has bitten me really hard this way several times, especially when packages are discarded and no longer present in EPEL. So it's worth thinking about in general for RPM based systems. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
