On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:29:30 +0200 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is actually not true. Well, as I noted in my reply, I wasn't actually sure what was being proposed here. > The repodata should contain just the latest > version, but if I have slightly older version of metadata already > downloaded, I would be probably fine with installation of slightly > older version of package. So, you are proposing we do things exactly as we are now, but also keep around all previous copies of the packages in the repos (but not in the repodata)? I'm not sure if that setup would work with dnf. I think it requires whatever mirror(s) it uses to match the metadata. If you have a older metadata and the mirror you hit has been updated, I think dnf will say that the repodata doesn't match and try another. kevin
Attachment:
pgpUqu2rr9dBn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
