Dne 2.8.2015 v 18:15 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 07:33:39 -0400 > Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> On 31 July 2015 at 17:27, Radek Holy <rholy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> One can say that the mirrors should keep the older versions >>> I would completely agree. As we can't rely that packages referenced >>> in metadata just one day old still being on the mirrors means that >>> PackageKit has to download hundreds of megabytes month more than it >>> has to. >>> >>> Richard. >> In the RHEL world, EPEL has bitten me really hard this way several >> times, especially when packages are discarded and no longer present in >> EPEL. So it's worth thinking about in general for RPM based systems. > > * repodata will likewise be 2x (or at least increased a great deal). > Resulting in a bunch more downloading for everyone not just the folks > who might want to downgrade sometimes. > This is actually not true. The repodata should contain just the latest version, but if I have slightly older version of metadata already downloaded, I would be probably fine with installation of slightly older version of package. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
