On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Certainly, but with none of the features in Btrfs actually emitting scary > "experimental" warnings anymore, and even all features working in btrfs RAID > 5/6 now, I think we should really start pushing it to more people. Or at > least develop some kind of test plan to prove the "worthiness" of using it > as default. We must have something, ne? Bingo! We need a. Pass/fail performance criteria b. Pass/fail data loss criteria c. Pass/fail security criteria and code to drive them all. My area of expertise is strictly performance. I'd be happy to contribute tests and analysis, although I suspect Phoronix may have everything needed. Let's say a three-way bakeoff - btrfs, ext4 and xfs (since IIRC xfs is a default in some RHEL configurations). Let me know if you want me to resurrect any of my 2009 stuff on disk performance. -- OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-journalists Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
