On 23 June 2015 at 18:40, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On 23 June 2015 at 14:15, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs >> >>> becoming the default in Fedora 23 >> >>> >> >>> . At this point, I'm personally convinced that it is certainly ready >> >>> and >> >>> doable for F23. >> >> >> >> >> >> Well actually he said his "plan" was to push for F23. I've been using >> >> btrfs raid 6 for several years now and have been lucky I haven't >> >> encountered >> >> any issues - but if you subscribe to the mailing list you'll see others >> >> haven't been quite as lucky. I'm sure he'll propose it once he >> >> believes it >> >> is ready. When proposing a default change it is prudent to be >> >> cautious. In >> >> the meantime it's there to use for early adopters; and the more people >> >> who >> >> test the faster issues will be identified and corrected. Just be sure >> >> you've taken the proper precautions.... ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> devel mailing list >> >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> > >> > >> > Certainly, but with none of the features in Btrfs actually emitting >> > scary >> > "experimental" warnings anymore, and even all features working in btrfs >> > RAID >> > 5/6 now, I think we should really start pushing it to more people. Or at >> > least develop some kind of test plan to prove the "worthiness" of using >> > it >> > as default. We must have something, ne? >> > >> >> So if there are problems who is going to deal with the users, diagnose >> the issues and fix them? Those are going to be the people who will >> need to push for this feature if they think it is ready or not. I >> would start by finding out who they are, talking with them and then >> looking at what time frame they think the feature would be ready. > > > That is precisely why I'm asking on this list. I don't know who those people > are, and this is really the best place I know of to start contact and those > discussions. > > My apologies.. my tone was not helpful. You are correct that asking here is where to start. I think the groups who would be able to help answer would be 1. Kernel team 2. QA team 3. Anaconda team 4. Workstation/Server/Cloud or just one if it were to be only on one product. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
