On 24 June 2015 at 04:28, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Certainly, but with none of the features in Btrfs actually emitting scary >> "experimental" warnings anymore, and even all features working in btrfs RAID >> 5/6 now, I think we should really start pushing it to more people. Or at >> least develop some kind of test plan to prove the "worthiness" of using it >> as default. We must have something, ne? > > Bingo! We need > > a. Pass/fail performance criteria > b. Pass/fail data loss criteria > c. Pass/fail security criteria > And advice for end users on btrfs management. People trying it out already are going to be more enthusiastic about understanding filesystems than the typical user. Also considering whether anything will be broken by the change, for example, df reporting inaccurate numbers may have knock on effects. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
