On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We're unlikely to move forward with btrfs for Workstation until the > kernel team changes its recommendation. There's work to be done that's not at all contingent on the kernel team changing its rec. Add Btrfs support to udisks (this was opened in 2010) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26258 Wrong Disk size with btrfs https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708786 manages Btrfs multiple device volumes incorrectly, cannot umount (obviously the above bug is still valid) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 btrfs snapshot and subvolume support https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710156 The first two act as regressions if Btrfs is made default fs. The third could corrupt the file system (it hasn't yet for me despite my cruelty, but no file system enjoys being yanked before unmounted). The fourth is more of a feature request. -- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
