V Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:20:49 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> napsáno: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:17:14PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 17:49:45 +0100, > > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >Anyway, here is the BZ: > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211344 > > > > I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208626 > > previously. You can disable it on the command line for scripting. > > OK, but I think it's better if all dnf plugins understand 'dnf -y', > otherwise we'll end up having to have a pile of --disableplugin hacks > for every badly behaved plugin. > > Rich. > And what should be the behaviour in this one? Clearly -y assuming Y for the plugin in question is very dangerous because it would replace all your configs that were updated in the upgraded package(s). I agree it would make sense for this plugin to be turned off by default, it's dangerous if used without caution, although I also agree it can be a very useful plugin, cause you can spot config changes in nicely formatted way (diff) during upgrade(s) and see if there's any problem if left without attention (our policies for updates and update QA are one of the best out there, but there can still be some slippage or during distro upgrade this can happen as well...). Cheers, Martin -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
