On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:45:41 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I see that dnf has sprung apt-style configuration file messages: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ sudo dnf install mingw32-srvany > Using metadata from Mon Apr 13 13:56:00 2015 (1:43:07 hours old) > Package mingw32-srvany-1.0-15.20150115gitfd659e77.fc23.noarch is > already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Configuration file '/etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth' > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Feb 21 > 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth -> fingerprint-auth-ac -rw-r--r--. 1 > root root 701 May 9 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth.rpmnew > > ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. > What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: > Y or I : install the package maintainer's version > N or O : keep your currently-installed version > D : show the differences between the versions > M : merge configuration files > Z : background this process to examine the situation > S : skip this file > The default action is to keep your current version. > *** aliases (Y/I/N/O/D/M/Z/S) [default=N] ? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In fact I _didn't_ change that file, so the message is wrong. > > I suspect we'll end up with Debian interactive installs, which as a > Debian user I find to be a regression. > > - 'dnf -y install' doesn't suppress the message. > > - In fact you cannot even kill it with ^C. You have to killall -9 > dnf. > > This happens on dozens of file now, every time I use dnf. Make it go > away! I suspect this is caused by the 'rpmconf' plugin ? sudo dnf remove python3-dnf-plugins-extras-rpmconf I agree it's behavior isn't good there. Bug(s) filed? kevin
Attachment:
pgpUnsVjvPQSb.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
