----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 5:01:45 PM > Subject: Re: dnf interactive config file updates > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:45:41 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I see that dnf has sprung apt-style configuration file messages: > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > $ sudo dnf install mingw32-srvany > > Using metadata from Mon Apr 13 13:56:00 2015 (1:43:07 hours old) > > Package mingw32-srvany-1.0-15.20150115gitfd659e77.fc23.noarch is > > already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. > > Nothing to do. > > Configuration file '/etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth' > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 Feb 21 > > 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth -> fingerprint-auth-ac -rw-r--r--. 1 > > root root 701 May 9 2012 /etc/pam.d/fingerprint-auth.rpmnew > > > > ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. > > What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: > > Y or I : install the package maintainer's version > > N or O : keep your currently-installed version > > D : show the differences between the versions > > M : merge configuration files > > Z : background this process to examine the situation > > S : skip this file > > The default action is to keep your current version. > > *** aliases (Y/I/N/O/D/M/Z/S) [default=N] ? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > In fact I _didn't_ change that file, so the message is wrong. > > > > I suspect we'll end up with Debian interactive installs, which as a > > Debian user I find to be a regression. > > > > - 'dnf -y install' doesn't suppress the message. > > > > - In fact you cannot even kill it with ^C. You have to killall -9 > > dnf. > > > > This happens on dozens of file now, every time I use dnf. Make it go > > away! > > I suspect this is caused by the 'rpmconf' plugin ? Yes, correct. > sudo dnf remove python3-dnf-plugins-extras-rpmconf > > I agree it's behavior isn't good there. Bug(s) filed? Yes, please. Against the DNF's community plugins (dnf-plugins-extras), please. And can you please also immediately file a Bugzilla (if it does not exist) next time you hit a bug? Thanks in advance -- Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
